搜索关注在线英语听力室公众号:tingroom,领取免费英语资料大礼包。
(单词翻译)
Stamp duty
Unexpected bills
Why stamp-duty tax cuts may hurt homebuyers
“TODAY I'm cutting stamp duty for millions of homebuyers,” crowed George Osborne, the chancellor1 of the exchequer2, on December 3rd when announcing reforms to stamp duty, a tax on buying property. Yet hidden in the forecasts of the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) is an assumption that implies most homebuyers will be made worse off by the tax cut. For every one percentage-point reduction in the tax, the OBR assumes that house prices will rise by 1.4%, leaving buyers with a bigger overall bill.
At first sight, this seems odd. Economics suggests that the sensitivity of buyers and sellers to changes in the price—“price elasticity”, in the jargon—influences who ends up paying most for “transaction taxes” like stamp duty. Housing supply is not very responsive to price: it is hard to build homes quickly to take advantage of a price spike3. That means, according to economic reasoning, that, if stamp duty is cut, you would expect prices to rise and sellers to benefit more than buyers.
What economists4 would not expect, though, is that buyers would end up absolutely worse off. So why are buyers left with a bigger overall bill? Mortgages are key to solving the mystery. Most buyers are what economists call “credit-constrained”. What they can splash out on a new place is limited by what they can borrow. And the amount they can borrow depends in part on how much cash they can put down as a deposit.
Stamp duty—a bill which must be paid immediately on buying property—drains that cash. When it is cut, buyers can put down higher deposits and borrow more. As a result, demand rises, pushing up the price enough to more than offset5 the benefit of the tax cut.
If the OBR is right, buyers of a property that cost £300,000 before the change in stamp duty now face £4,000 less tax but a price £5,600 higher. Buyers who were not previously6 in the market but can now afford a deposit will benefit, but this group is small. The main winners are homeowners, who benefit from higher house prices.
There is a parallel with the government's flagship intervention7 in the housing market: Help to Buy. That scheme aims to assist buyers who cannot afford deposits by providing them with government loans. But its biggest effect is to boost demand and hence prices. Homeowners keep winning from government policy.
1 chancellor | |
n.(英)大臣;法官;(德、奥)总理;大学校长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 exchequer | |
n.财政部;国库 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 spike | |
n.长钉,钉鞋;v.以大钉钉牢,使...失效 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 economists | |
n.经济学家,经济专家( economist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 offset | |
n.分支,补偿;v.抵消,补偿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 previously | |
adv.以前,先前(地) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 intervention | |
n.介入,干涉,干预 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
本文本内容来源于互联网抓取和网友提交,仅供参考,部分栏目没有内容,如果您有更合适的内容,欢迎 点击提交 分享给大家。