豆知识 2011-10-09&10-15 电子设备的故事 (3/3)
时间:2012-04-19 05:57:42
搜索关注在线英语听力室公众号:tingroom,领取免费英语资料大礼包。
(单词翻译)
Imagine that instead of all this toxic1 e-waste piling up in our garages and the streets of Guiyu, we sent it to the garages of the CEOs who made it. You can bet that they’d be on the phone to their designers pretty fast demanding they stop designing for the dump.
Making companies deal with their e-waste is called Extended Producer Responsibility or Product Take-back. If all these old
gadgets2 were their problem, it would be cheaper for them to just design them longer
lasting3, less toxic, and more recyclable in the first place. They could even make them modular so that when one part broke, they could just send us a new piece instead of taking back the whole broken mess.
Already take-back laws are popping up all over Europe and Asia. In the U.S. many cities and states are passing similar laws. These laws need to be protected and strengthened. It’s time to get these brainiacs on our side. With take-back laws and citizen action to demand greener products, we can start a race to the top, where designers compete to make long-lasting, toxic-free products.
So let’s have a green Moore’s law. How about the use of toxic chemicals will be cut in half every 18 months? The number of workers poisoned will
decline4 at an ever faster rate? We need to give these designers a challenge they can rise to and do what they do best.
Innovate5! Already, some of them are realizing they’re too smart to be dump designers and are figuring out how to make computers without PVC or toxic flame retardants. Good Job, guys!
But we can do even more. When we take our e-waste to recyclers, we can make sure they don’t export it to developing countries. And when we do need to buy new gadgets, we can choose greener products. But the truth is we are never going to just shop our way out of this problem, because the choices available to us at the store are limited by the choices of designers and policy
makers6 outside of the store. That’s why we need to join with others to demand stronger laws on toxic chemicals and on banning e-waste exports.
There are billions of people out there who want access to the
incredible7 web of information and entertainment that
electronics8 offer. But it’s the access they want, not all the toxic garbage. So, let’s get our brains working on sending that old design for the dump
mentality9 to the dump where it belongs and instead building an electronics industry and a global society that’s designed to last.
分享到: