VOA标准英语2013--印度领事官员在纽约被捕引争议

（单词翻译）

Arrest of Indian Consular² Official in NY Sparks Dispute 印度领事官员在纽约被捕引争议

NEW YORK — An international controversy³, sparked after the arrest of a senior Indian consular official in New York, is continuing. The Indian official was charged  with paying her domestic employee far less than New York’s legal minimum wage, and with causing her employee to lie on her U.S. State Department visa application.   Indian protesters say her arrest violated her diplomatic immunity⁵.

In India, official and grassroots outrage⁶ continued over the arrest in New York last week of Deputy Consul¹ General Devyani Khobragade by U.S. authorities.

At a news conference Thursday, U.S. State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf tried to de-escalate tensions with India, an important relationship for the U.S.  “This incident is not something that should define that certainly or that should negatively impact that. What we’re focused on is having many conversations at many  levels about moving this relationship forward, about moving past this episode and letting the legal and judicial⁷ process move itself forward," said Harf.

But Dan Arshack, Khobragade’s lawyer, wants the legal and judicial process against his client to halt. He says her arrest and strip search violated the diplomatic  immunity she is guaranteed under international law.   “We hope that we won’t ever have to address the charges in court, because we hope and expect that from a diplomatic level this case will be resolved. But we are  confident that if we do have to address the charges, she will be completetly vindicated," said Arshack.

Jo Becker of Human Rights Watch understands Khobragade’s predicament, but is unmoved.

“The diplomat⁴ has been charged with a felony, and there has been a big uproar⁸ over her treatment - the fact that she was booked, the fact that she was strip searched.  But the controversy has completely overshadowed the exploitation of her employee and similar abuses of domestic workers that happen worldwide every single day," said  Becker.

A balance must be struck between competing views, says Pace University Law Professor Thomas McDonnell.

He believes India's government has overreacted.

“The idea of removing the concrete barriers in front of our embassy that protect our ambassador and other officials in that embassy from a terrorist attack seems  extraordinarily out of proportion. So what they have done in my view is far worse than what we have done," said McDonnell.