PBS高端访谈:北约指挥官:在欧洲使用武力的俄罗斯是一个巨大的威胁

搜索关注在线英语听力室公众号：tingroom，领取免费英语资料大礼包。

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE, NATO Supreme¹ Allied² Commander: Oh, thanks for having me.

　　GWEN IFILL: I want to start by talking about Turkey. How significant is it that Turkey has allowed us to start using Incirlik for a basing to attack ISIS?

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE: Those things that we are working at now to use bases like Incirlik and Diyarbakir, those will be very important to our ability to prosecute³ a joint⁴ campaign with Turkey as a part of our coalition⁵.

　　GWEN IFILL: How far does that buffer⁶ zone go and how far do we go into it?

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE: We're not creating any specific zone.

　　What we're talking about is bringing Turkey into an arrangement where, as a part of the coalition, they cooperate in our counter-ISIL campaign in the north. And that's the real key to this.

　　GWEN IFILL: So, it's not a no-fly zone, per se, is what you are saying?

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE: That's correct.

　　GWEN IFILL: I want to take you to Ukraine, especially Russia's role. The new incoming nominee⁷ to be — for Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joe Dunford, said at a congressional hearing last week that he saw Russia as our chief global threat. Is that something you agree with?

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE: I have testified to the same thing in the past.

　　GWEN IFILL: Why?

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE: Well, clearly, there are lots of threats out there, for instance, ISIL.

　　But I think what you hear from numerous leaders is that Russia is a different case. This is a nation that for 20 years we have tried to make a partner. And in the last few years, we have seen that they're on a different path. So now we have a nation that has used force to change internationally recognized boundaries. Russia continues to occupy Crimea.

　　Russian forces now are in the Donbass in Eastern Ukraine. So this nation has used force to change international boundaries. And this is a nation that possesses a pretty vast nuclear inventory⁸, and talks about the use of that inventory very openly in the past. And so what I think you see being reflected is that we see a revanchist Russia that has taken a new path towards what the security arrangements in Europe are like and how they are employed.

　　And they talk about using, as a matter of course, nuclear weapons. For that reason, these senior leaders, I believe, see that as a major threat.

　　GWEN IFILL: Secretary Kerry has not said that. And I wonder if the distinction there is between the diplomatic approach to dealing⁹ with Russia on things like Iran and the military concerns.

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE: So, Russia can and we hope in the future will be a great partner. There are many places where our needs and requirements match.

　　But, again, in Europe, they have established a pattern now, Georgia, Transnistria, Crimea, Donbass, where force is a matter of course. And that's not what we look for in partners in Europe.

　　GWEN IFILL: So NATO has talked about providing training and artillery¹⁰ and some sort of support against this force you describe, this Russian bear on the border. Is that enough?

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE: Well, NATO nations are offering some assistance to Ukraine, as is the United States. Many nations now are coming along to be a part of helping¹¹ Ukraine to defend themselves. They have the right to defend themselves.

　　GWEN IFILL: But is it enough?

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE: I think that question is yet to be determined¹².

　　We believe that there is a diplomatic and a political solution. So when you ask, is it enough, the question is, is it enough to set the conditions so that we can get to a political and a diplomatic solution?

　　GWEN IFILL: What about the Baltics? There is a lot of nervousness that Russia is going to expand its view of aggression¹³ in that direction as well, and they will be entirely¹⁴ unable to defend themselves.

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE: Both NATO, as an alliance, and the United States have come to great measures of assurance for our Baltic nations.

　　We have U.S. soldiers alongside British and other soldiers inside of these countries now, exercising, doing training, to assure those allies that NATO is there and will be there. I was privileged to sit in the room at Wales when the leaders of 28 nations, including our president, were rock-solid on Article V, collective defense¹⁵. And that includes the Baltics.

　　And I think that Mr. Putin understands that NATO is different.

　　GWEN IFILL: There is a lot of nervousness, however, that this option, if this doesn't take hold, is war.

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE: Well, the best way not to have a war is to be prepared for war. So, we're in there now, training their soldiers.

　　As you know, we are looking at and have decided¹⁶ to preposition stops forward. We have heavy equipment that we train with in these nations now. And so we need to be prepared, so that we can avoid.

　　GWEN IFILL: Is there a line between preparation and provocation¹⁷?

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE: Absolutely. I believe there is.

　　We do defensive¹⁸ measures, and in, I think, very easily defined defensive stances in our forward bases. We're not putting big forces into the Baltics. Right now, there is a company of U.S. soldiers in each of the three Baltic states. That is well below a proportional issue.

　　GWEN IFILL: If it is possible for there to be a diplomatic or a political solution to head off any future conflict, what would that look like?

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE: We always talk about a European land mass whole, free, and at peace.

　　To get to that, we need to have a partner in Russia, not someone that we are competing with. The Russian energy…

　　GWEN IFILL: Do you see a partnership¹⁹ that I don't see?

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE: No, no, I'm saying we have to have one in the future.

　　GWEN IFILL: Right.

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE: If we really believe we're going to get to whole, free, and at peace and prosperous, then we need a partner in Russia.

　　GWEN IFILL: Well, give me an example of one way to get there, especially if the person who has to be your partner is Vladimir Putin, who doesn't show any indication, other than being helpful at the Iran nuclear talks, of being the partner you envision.

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE: So first, it's communication. We need to reestablish those lines of communication.

　　You have seen our secretary of state, undersecretary of state reaching out in several forums²⁰. Mil-to-mil communications need to become routine again. They are not routine now, where they were once before, communication first.

　　GWEN IFILL: I guess I hear what you are saying, but I don't see how you get there.

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE: Its' not going to be an easy road. And it's not going to happen quickly. This business with Russia is a long-term thing.

　　I have said in testimony²¹ in other places that this is global, not regional. And it is long-term, not short-term. But we have to start down the path.

　　GWEN IFILL: Assuming for a moment there is a diplomatic-to-diplomatic impasse²² or president-to-president impasse, is there a military-to-military way of forging that kind of agreement?

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE: There is.

　　It is important also that, even if our countries are not getting along, when you are flying airplanes in close vicinity, when you are sailing ships in close vicinity, when you have soldiers on the ground exercising sometimes just on the other side of borders, military men and women have to be able to communicate in a very matter-of-fact way to preclude²³ anything ugly from happening.

　　GWEN IFILL: Well, and we hope nothing further ugly happens.

　　NATO Supreme Allied Commander General Philip Breedlove, thank you very much.

　　GEN. PHILIP BREEDLOVE: No, thank you very much.

分享到：