诺贝尔经济学奖得主研究人们如何花钱

（单词翻译）

AS IT IS 2016-10-13 Nobel Prize Winners Studied Agreements Affecting Everyone 诺贝尔经济学奖得主研究人们如何花钱

Two professors at American universities have won the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences. They were honored for their work on business agreements that affect billions of people worldwide: contracts.

“The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided¹ to award the Sveriges Richsbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel for 2016 to Oliver Hart and Bengt Holmstrom for their contributions to contract theory.”

Goran Hansson, the Secretary General of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences announced the prize Monday.

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said the prize was awarded for work on the theory of contracts. These agreements affect almost every part of modern life.

Contracts are everywhere

Insurance, loans, buying agreements, employment, property rights, political constitutions and marriage are all kinds of contracts.

Hart and Holmstrom developed a theory for understanding how contracts work. Their research has been used to design contracts. It relates to contracts in private markets and in public policy.

Contracts are agreements between a principal and an agent. One example of this relationship is the one between an employer and an employee.

The leader of a company and its shareholders² also have a contractual agreement.

Hart and Holmstrom’s work raised questions about tying the pay of high-level officials to a company’s current profits. They found that performance-based pay might not be the best policy in some cases. Doing so, may give a business leader an incentive⁴ to make decisions that increase profits for a short period of time. Those same decisions may harm the company over the long term.

The two also studied insurance contracts. They argued that people may become careless if insurance companies fully⁵ replaced things that are damaged in an accident, such as cars. So, insurance companies often have contract holders³ pay a deductible toward repair. Insurers also limit what they are willing pay for or replace in many cases.

Holmstrom worked with others to describe how contracts meant to improve one kind of performance can hurt overall job performance. For example, if teacher pay is tied to student test scores then many other parts of a teacher’s job could be negatively affected⁶.

Hart and Holmstrom worked together to show that contracts cannot describe every part of a job. Contracts are in some ways always incomplete.

The two said contracts cannot predict every need and requirement in the future. Holmstrom researched the subject for many years. He advised that contracts should make clear what needs to be done to deal with future disagreements between parties rather than center on specific requirements.

The new Nobel prize winners also examined whether some jobs are better done by government or private industry.

In 1997, Hart worked with others in a study that showed the incentive to reduce costs is usually stronger among private contractors⁷. The research called into question the policy of some privately⁸ run public services, like prisons.

The Nobel committee praised Hart and Holmstrom for providing the tools to think about and design better contracts in many different fields.

Oliver Hart was born in London. He spent much of his professional life at American universities. Co-winner Bengt Holmstrom was born in Helsinki, Finland. He also spent most of his career in the United States.

The two have been friends for years. The Nobel Prize committee’s twitter account Tweeted Hart’s reaction:

“My first action was to hug my wife, wake up my younger son ... and I actually spoke⁹ to my fellow Laureate” Oliver Hart #NobelPrize

— The Nobel Prize (@NobelPrize) October 10, 2016

?

The two will share the economics prize worth $924,000. It is the only Nobel prize not established by Alfred Nobel. Sweden’s central bank established the prize in his honor.

The Nobel prize for literature will be announced Thursday.

Words in This Story

principal – n. a person or group who has responsibility as a guarantor of something such as payment

contribution – n. something that is done to cause something to happen

agent – n. someone acting¹⁰ on behalf of someone else

incentive – n. a reason to do something

deductible – n. an amount of a claim not paid by an insurance company

negatively – adv. badly; poorly

specific – adj. special or particular