搜索关注在线英语听力室公众号:tingroom,领取免费英语资料大礼包。
(单词翻译)
ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:
How do you tell what's real from what's not on the Internet, especially when paid foreign agents and political operatives are working hard to create believable stories that are complete fiction? This is something Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has been thinking about. This week, he delivered the keynote address at an international media forum1 on the topic, and he joins us now from London. Welcome.
JIMMY WALES: Thank you.
SHAPIRO: I think a lot of the Internet giants - Facebook, YouTube, Wikipedia - were founded on a kind of idealistic hope that the more open and connected people were online, the better things would be for everyone. Do you still hold that belief?
WALES: Yeah, very much. In this era where we've seen the rise of these fake news websites and so forth2, Wikipedia has had almost no problems with this at all simply because our community is quite - you know, it's their hobby to debate about the quality of sources. And it's very difficult to fool the Wikipedia community with this.
SHAPIRO: The Internet has certainly had a problem with this. And some would say it is a problem of too many people having too much access being able to offer too freely ideas that are completely made up.
WALES: (Laughter) Yeah, well, that's just human life. All of us have a few idiot friends, and now they can share stuff on Facebook. The thing is, it's easy to be a little bit condescending3 about these people and to joke about idiots sharing nonsense. But the truth is, in free societies, people have a right to not be interested in the news. But when you're not that interested in the news and you do decide, hey, I think I want to find out some information, you still deserve to get quality information. And that's what we've really been lacking.
SHAPIRO: There is now so much money and power resting in the distortion of the narrative4, whether you're talking about a country like Russia acting5 in its geopolitical interest or a political activist6 who's willing to spend millions of dollars to get someone elected who will pursue a specific policy. When there is that much at stake, aren't the people who are fighting for factual accuracy going to be forever outgunned?
WALES: We're getting there. I mean, a lot of people say they've lost trust in the media, and they think everything is propaganda. And then it becomes very hard to come to any kind of a consensus7 in society where we say, well, look; you and I disagree on a certain policy, but here are some facts underlying8 it, and we can at least agree on those facts, whereas now I feel like a lot of people are just adrift. They don't know what to believe.
SHAPIRO: Is there one step that you think people could do that would go some distance towards undoing9 some of this problem?
WALES: Maybe one step that a lot of people could do is immediately take a more skeptical10 attitude towards things that you're sharing online. Just take a second, and look in a search engine. Check some of the keywords and terms, and just make sure you're not adding to the problem.
SHAPIRO: Do you think hundreds of millions of Americans are actually going to do that?
WALES: It's not required that everybody do it. As long as some people in our social circles are vigilant11 about this sort of thing, they can raise the alarm. I'll give an example. I nearly posted something. So here was this story that said scientists have confirmed that if your cat was big enough, it would eat you. And that's a funny story, right?
SHAPIRO: (Laughing) It's a great story.
WALES: And we all kind of - we kind of believe it about cats, right?
SHAPIRO: Right.
WALES: And I was about to share it to my daughter. And I just thought, I'm going to google this quickly. And I did. And what I found was it linked to an original study. I opened that PDF, and I looked through it. And you know what? the study absolutely said nothing of the sort. So I didn't share it, and that was a good thing.
And I felt like, whew, I nearly got duped by a great story. I mean, that's the thing. A lot of the things that do go viral, they go viral because you hear it, and you chuckle12. And you're like, that's great. And it confirms something you believe is probably true anyway. So you just blast it off, and you've just been fooled.
SHAPIRO: That's a great story, but I can also imagine a lot of listeners saying, I would never have taken those steps - open a PDF, read a scientific study. I see something funny on Facebook. I send it to my kid.
WALES: (Laughter) Yeah, well, think again. You might be sharing fake news.
SHAPIRO: Jimmy Wales, thank you so much for talking with us today.
WALES: Yes. Thank you.
SHAPIRO: He's the co-founder of Wikipedia. And this week, he gave the keynote address at the Westminster Media Forum titled "Next Steps For Tackling Fake News."
1 forum | |
n.论坛,讨论会 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 condescending | |
adj.谦逊的,故意屈尊的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 narrative | |
n.叙述,故事;adj.叙事的,故事体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 acting | |
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 activist | |
n.活动分子,积极分子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 consensus | |
n.(意见等的)一致,一致同意,共识 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 underlying | |
adj.在下面的,含蓄的,潜在的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 undoing | |
n.毁灭的原因,祸根;破坏,毁灭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 skeptical | |
adj.怀疑的,多疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 vigilant | |
adj.警觉的,警戒的,警惕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 chuckle | |
vi./n.轻声笑,咯咯笑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
本文本内容来源于互联网抓取和网友提交,仅供参考,部分栏目没有内容,如果您有更合适的内容,欢迎 点击提交 分享给大家。