搜索关注在线英语听力室公众号:tingroom,领取免费英语资料大礼包。
(单词翻译)
LULU GARCIA-NAVARRO, HOST:
By and large, women have had a rough time of it in mystery novels, mostly appearing as beautiful corpses1, appendages2 to the detectives and cops and lawyers saving the day. But writers like Megan Abbott write female characters who go way beyond dead bodies. In fact, they're often killers3.
Abbott's latest thriller4 is called "Give Me Your Hand," and it's the story of two female scientists named Kit5 and Diane. They were friends in high school. But when Diane shares a dark secret, the friendship is torn apart. They're later reunited as they compete for a prestigious6 spot on a scientific research team. That team is studying premenstrual dysphoric disorder7, or PMDD, an extreme form of PMS. It's the kind of thing that's often used against women. So I asked Megan Abbott why she chose to make it a major part of her new book.
MEGAN ABBOTT: An ongoing8 fascination9 for me is this sort of idea that the female body is monstrous10 and that women aren't in control of their emotions and all of that. But the fact is there is a real thing and is not uncommon11. And like so many women's health issues, it's just been very under-researched and stigmatized12. It's also been used in a few cases as a criminal defense13, which is how I first sort of began reading about it - not successfully, by the way. But it does really wreak14 havoc15 on the women who suffer from it.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: So we're not going to talk about the central mystery of the book, but I do want to talk about this idea of what motivates women to kill. Dr. Severin, who runs the lab where these two scientists work, muses16 that maybe there's something violent and sort of essentially17 scary about women. And this is, in essence, what you've made your career about, right?
ABBOTT: Yes. And it's so much, of course, about the - what has been projected upon women throughout time, you know? We're always sort of, you know, sort of the victim of, you know, hundreds of sort of legends and stereotypes19 and archetypes. And I think that women do commit murder far less frequently. And when they do, it's so much more shocking to people, somehow. So I think there is a desire to somehow make it seem monstrous and also make it seem extraordinary because, you know, why would women ever be violent? They should be happy.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: Right...
ABBOTT: Everything should be great.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: And men have a monopoly - yes - on violence, right...
ABBOTT: (Laughter) Yes. Still do (laughter).
GARCIA-NAVARRO: Still do. You've set mysteries in gymnastics clubs and cheerleading teams and now the oh-so-brutally competitive science academic community. But your work focuses on this fine line between friendship and rivalry20, and you do this so well. How do you explore what's almost a trope about women without making it a trope?
ABBOTT: Yeah. It is really tricky21. I mean, there's that phrase that sort of gets bandied around - frenemy, you know? - for those women in our lives who we are very close to. But there is that competitive instinct. And I think part of it is that - is still, as a culture, women are not supposed to be ambitious or competitive in the same way. And when they are, it's frightening. So it gets sort of subverted23 or pushed down or suppressed. And then, when it does emerge, it can emerge in odd ways. And I'll confess while I was writing this that it was during the presidential campaign, so sort of the fear of female ambition was very much on my mind.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: I was wondering, actually, when this was written because the talking about menstruation - I mean, I'm reminded of the moment when then-candidate Trump24 said about Megyn Kelly, you know, blood coming out of her eyes or whatever, this idea of women's bodies and how they're used in public discourse25.
ABBOTT: Right. And that moment - it worked both ways, right? It both thought - it was incredible that he was saying this to so many of us. But it was also incredible how shocked everyone was, which I think speaks to the idea that women's bodies and their natural functions are still very stigmatized. There - you know, people don't want to talk about periods, you know? Tampons. When you buy it at the drugstore, they double bag it so you won't be seen on the street with it.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: There's still shame attached to it...
ABBOTT: Yeah.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: What is it, though, that allows you to sort of subvert22 that idea and be like, you know, women can be rivals and still not have catfights?
ABBOTT: Right. Yeah, because that's always the sort of - the version you don't want to do when you're writing this. You want to indulge in this stereotype18. But I do, you know, in Kit and Diane's relationship in particular - it's very complicated. And I don't think it ever lands in one court or another. There's an emotional connection they feel in part because they do fire the other one up and hang, you know? And Kit owes Diane a lot for, you know, sort of encouraging her and getting her to sort of embrace her brain so to speak. So I think, you know, the way to avoid the stereotype is just to really go in deep and acknowledge that there's lots of murky26 stuff there and lots of wonderful stuff, too.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: Yeah. But I guess one of the things that it does acknowledge is that there are only a few spots for women because most of those spots are filled by men.
ABBOTT: Yes. And that - I mean, we - there are so many workplaces and fields that that's still the case. And when - in all the research I did in the sciences, it was quite extreme. And so there is that notion. But I think women feel in many professions that, you know, there's that one spot. And if a woman gets it, then that's it. There's no place for you, you know? And I think, you know, when those are the stakes, things are going to get a little ugly.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: Female killers are having a cultural moment. Is there something about female anger and the #MeToo movement that has given us things like, you know, these two brilliant TV series that are out now - "Killing27 Eve" and "Sharp Objects"? And now, two of your own novels, this one and "Dare Me" have been optioned for television, as well.
ABBOTT: Yes, I do think so. I mean, I think it was always there, you know? It was bubbling just barely beneath the surface the last many years, I mean, last centuries, one could say. But I've just found a lot of the books coming out now, for instance - or the things that are being made now that were written years ago are because of not just the #MeToo movement but the campaign and the election and sort of all - these are gender28 wars that sort of came to the surface, you know? It's sort of like the return of the repressed. And, now, we're sort of seeing the fruits of it everywhere, culturally.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: I am curious, you know? You've written for TV a lot on David Simon's "The Deuce," and I believe you're writing your own pilot, right?
ABBOTT: Yes.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: So can you talk a little bit about the writers' rooms you've been in and the conversations you've had as the #MeToo movement has developed? Do you see anything really changing and moving in Hollywood?
ABBOTT: I think there is a great desire for change. And I do see that, you know, when I was working on "The Deuce," you know? The - you know, in the past, they had been primarily all men in the writers' room, and this time, there were three women. And, of course, it changed the conversation. And I think that - I have noticed there is, you know, more conscious of it. The pilot I'm working on for "Dare Me" - we have a female director, a female DP, two female writers that wrote the pilot, you know? So I do think that before, you may have had to justify29 that and make the case. But I think, at least in this moment, you don't have to make that case anymore. It's clear.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: Yeah. You're saying at least in this moment. That, to me, sounds like there's a little bit of skepticism about the longevity30 of this moment.
ABBOTT: Well, you do worry about backlash. And, you know, I mean, that's - I guess we're just so - I mean, as women, we've sort of seen these windows before. And then, we've seen them, you know, close on our fingers (laughter). So I think this time, there - a lot more of us are - you know, have wedged our bodies underneath31 that window so to speak to make sure it doesn't close again and many men, too.
GARCIA-NAVARRO: Suspense32 writer Megan Abbott. Her latest book is "Give Me Your Hand." Thank you very much.
ABBOTT: Thank you.
1 corpses | |
n.死尸,尸体( corpse的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 appendages | |
n.附属物( appendage的名词复数 );依附的人;附属器官;附属肢体(如臂、腿、尾等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 killers | |
凶手( killer的名词复数 ); 消灭…者; 致命物; 极难的事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 thriller | |
n.惊险片,恐怖片 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 kit | |
n.用具包,成套工具;随身携带物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 prestigious | |
adj.有威望的,有声望的,受尊敬的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 disorder | |
n.紊乱,混乱;骚动,骚乱;疾病,失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 ongoing | |
adj.进行中的,前进的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 fascination | |
n.令人着迷的事物,魅力,迷恋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 monstrous | |
adj.巨大的;恐怖的;可耻的,丢脸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 uncommon | |
adj.罕见的,非凡的,不平常的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 stigmatized | |
v.使受耻辱,指责,污辱( stigmatize的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 wreak | |
v.发泄;报复 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 havoc | |
n.大破坏,浩劫,大混乱,大杂乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 muses | |
v.沉思,冥想( muse的第三人称单数 );沉思自语说(某事) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 stereotype | |
n.固定的形象,陈规,老套,旧框框 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 stereotypes | |
n.老套,模式化的见解,有老一套固定想法的人( stereotype的名词复数 )v.把…模式化,使成陈规( stereotype的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 rivalry | |
n.竞争,竞赛,对抗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 tricky | |
adj.狡猾的,奸诈的;(工作等)棘手的,微妙的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 subvert | |
v.推翻;暗中破坏;搅乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 subverted | |
v.颠覆,破坏(政治制度、宗教信仰等)( subvert的过去式和过去分词 );使(某人)道德败坏或不忠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 discourse | |
n.论文,演说;谈话;话语;vi.讲述,著述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 murky | |
adj.黑暗的,朦胧的;adv.阴暗地,混浊地;n.阴暗;昏暗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 killing | |
n.巨额利润;突然赚大钱,发大财 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 gender | |
n.(生理上的)性,(名词、代词等的)性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 justify | |
vt.证明…正当(或有理),为…辩护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 longevity | |
n.长命;长寿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 underneath | |
adj.在...下面,在...底下;adv.在下面 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 suspense | |
n.(对可能发生的事)紧张感,担心,挂虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
本文本内容来源于互联网抓取和网友提交,仅供参考,部分栏目没有内容,如果您有更合适的内容,欢迎 点击提交 分享给大家。