搜索关注在线英语听力室公众号:tingroom,领取免费英语资料大礼包。
(单词翻译)
DAVID GREENE, HOST:
A Chinese researcher is claiming to have created the world's first genetically1 edited human babies. According to the scientist, the genes4 of two twin girls have been modified to resist HIV infection. That's the virus that causes AIDS. This claim is highly controversial with some scientists denouncing this work as unethical human experimentation5. NPR health correspondent Rob Stein joins us now to talk about this. Hi there, Rob.
ROB STEIN, BYLINE6: Oh, hey there, David.
GREENE: All right. Let's start by who the scientist is. And how are we learning about this right now?
STEIN: Yes. So his name is He Jiankui, and he works at the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, China. Right now he's at a meeting in Hong Kong. It's the International Summit on Human Gene3 Editing. And that's where he's making this extraordinary claim.
GREENE: What is the claim? What does he say he's actually done here?
STEIN: Yeah, so he says he's used a powerful new kind of genetic2 engineering - it's called CRISPR - to make changes in human embryos7 and then use those human embryos to try to make babies. And he even claims, as you said, that he was able to create a pair of twin girls. And they were born a few weeks ago from these genetically modified embryos. And their names are Lulu and Nana. They're supposedly healthy and back home with their parents, Mark and Grace.
GREENE: So how is the scientific community reacting to this moment?
STEIN: Yeah. Well, as you mentioned, this is extremely controversial.
GREENE: Yeah.
STEIN: I mean, a lot of scientists - you know, they think this sort of thing - it may be OK someday to try to prevent a long list of really terrible diseases. But even advocates of editing human DNA8 like this are saying, look. This is just way too premature9. And we're kind of getting ahead of ourselves here. I talked to, for example, Jennifer Doudna. She's one of the scientists from California who's credited with helping10 invent CRISPR, this gene-editing technique. And, you know, she's saying that there's a lot of concerns. And a big one is safety, I mean, for any kids that anybody tries to make this way. And so a lot more research is needed to make sure it is safe and it really works. And perhaps even more importantly, scientists say, look. We need a broad societal debate to figure out, like, you know, in what circumstances should we do this? And how should we proceed? And we're far from having that consensus11 on how to modify the human genetic blueprint12 this way.
GREENE: I mean, a really significant debate because, I mean, this is this is raising the question of, you know, so-called designer babies and opening the door to all sorts of stuff, right?
STEIN: That's right. This is the sort of thing that's long been considered taboo13 - you know, genetically modifying human beings in a way that could be passed down for generations. And the big fear, as I said, is safety. You know, if scientists make some kind of mistake, they could, you know, create a new disease that would then be passed down for generations. And, you know, it does open the door to this, you know, kind of scary scenario14 people call designer babies, where scientists don't do this, you know, for medical reasons but for other reasons - to make taller babies, stronger babies. And that could lead to this - you know, maybe some kind of super race of human beings considered to be genetically superior.
GREENE: But you did say that a lot of scientists think there might be a way to do this in an acceptable way someday in the future. So, I mean, what happens now with this Chinese scientist who says he's done this?
STEIN: Yeah. So the big thing right now is to validate16, did he really do this?
GREENE: Right.
STEIN: I mean, you know, this sort of thing usually comes out in a scientific journal after being carefully reviewed by other scientists. And this is, you know, a valid15 line of research that people have been pursuing for a while. But, you know, scientists really first want to know whether this is true. I mean, this would be an historic claim. Some people are comparing this to the birth of the, you know, first IVF baby, Louise Brown. So we need a lot more research to figure out whether this is true. And that this meeting in Hong Kong is going on right now - the purpose of this meeting is to really try to create a scientific consensus for when we should proceed with editing human DNA this way.
GREENE: NPR health correspondent Rob Stein. Rob, thanks.
STEIN: Oh, sure. Thanks to be - nice to be here, David.
1 genetically | |
adv.遗传上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 genetic | |
adj.遗传的,遗传学的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 gene | |
n.遗传因子,基因 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 genes | |
n.基因( gene的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 experimentation | |
n.实验,试验,实验法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 embryos | |
n.晶胚;胚,胚胎( embryo的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 DNA | |
(缩)deoxyribonucleic acid 脱氧核糖核酸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 premature | |
adj.比预期时间早的;不成熟的,仓促的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 helping | |
n.食物的一份&adj.帮助人的,辅助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 consensus | |
n.(意见等的)一致,一致同意,共识 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 blueprint | |
n.蓝图,设计图,计划;vt.制成蓝图,计划 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 taboo | |
n.禁忌,禁止接近,禁止使用;adj.禁忌的;v.禁忌,禁制,禁止 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 scenario | |
n.剧本,脚本;概要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 valid | |
adj.有确实根据的;有效的;正当的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 validate | |
vt.(法律)使有效,使生效 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
本文本内容来源于互联网抓取和网友提交,仅供参考,部分栏目没有内容,如果您有更合适的内容,欢迎 点击提交 分享给大家。