PBS高端访谈:白宫方面警告叙利亚不要再发动化武袭击

搜索关注在线英语听力室公众号：tingroom，领取免费英语资料大礼包。

　　Last night, the administration announced that the U.S. had detected — quote — "potential preparations" by the regime to use the banned weapons, again.

　　Chief foreign affairs correspondent Margaret Warner reports.

　　President Assad was seen today touring a Russian air base just hours after last night's White House statement.

　　It warned that the Syrian regime would pay a heavy price for launching another chemical attack.

　　Today, the Pentagon elaborated, saying the U.S. has seen active preparations for chemical weapons use at Shayrat air base near Homs in Western Syria.

　　Nancy Youssef is senior national security correspondent at BuzzFeed.

　　The Pentagon told us that they saw evidence of planes that were used to conduct aerial chemical attacks in the past being moved around on Shayrat airfield².

　　We also heard reports of chatter³ happening on the ground in preparation for a possible imminent⁴ attack.

　　The number of people who knew was so limited, and the message from the White House was so ominous⁵, that it created a real confusion that we are just not used to.

　　A chemical weapons attack was launched from that same base in April, killing⁶ dozens of men, women and children.

　　The Syrians denied responsibility. But President Trump⁷ ordered the U.S. military to fire 59 Tomahawk missiles at the base.

　　Mr. Trump's response was a sharp departure from his predecessor's caution about intervening in Syria's civil war.

　　In 2012, President Obama famously warned that the use of chemical weapons use would constitute a red line, triggering U.S. action.

　　But instead, after a deadly August, 2013, attack on a Damascus suburb,

　　then-Secretary of State John Kerry and Russia worked on a deal with Assad that aimed to rid his regime of chemical weapons.

　　Trump officials say that strategy clearly didn't work, and it's taking a tougher approach to Syria and its key backers.

　　U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley spoke⁸ at a House hearing today.

　　I believe that the goal is, at this point, not just to send Assad a message,

　　but to send Russia and Iran a message that, if this happens again, we are putting you on notice.

　　A spokesman for Russian President Vladimir Putin retorted: "Such threats to Syria's legitimate⁹ leaders are unacceptable."

　　Iran's foreign minister said: "Another dangerous U.S. escalation¹⁰ in Syria on fake pretext¹¹ will only serve ISIS," the Islamic State group.

　　Since the April 3 U.S. missile barrage¹², the U.S. has had several confrontations¹³ with pro-Assad forces, shooting down a Syrian air force jet and an armed Iranian-made drone.

　　In response, Russia has threatened to target coalition¹⁴ aircraft in certain parts of Syria. Today, it's unclear what the broader U.S. strategy is.

　　Is the U.S. committed to a form of deterrence¹⁵ against the regime for possible chemical attacks? And, if so, in what form?

　　Going forward, will the U.S. put out a statement every time it suspects chemical weapons attacks? Is that what we are to take away from yesterday's statement?

　　For the PBS NewsHour, I'm Margaret Warner. undefined

分享到：