搜索关注在线英语听力室公众号:tingroom,领取免费英语资料大礼包。
(单词翻译)
There is a consensus1 among the delegates and world leaders attending the climate change conference in Copenhagen on the need to cut greenhouse gas emissions2 and shift to cleaner/more efficient energy. But a research center in Britain is espousing3 a different, more controversial approach.
Rachel Smalley | London 16 December 2009
Photo: VOA Image
There are plenty of baby carriages on the streets of London, but Britain's birth-rate is low - just 1.8 children for every woman of child-bearing age.
The world's population, however, is soaring. It is currently 6.8 billion, according to the U.S Census4 Bureau, and the U.N. estimates it will reach 9 billion by 2050.
And that growth rate, according to Simon Ross of Britain's Optimum Population Trust, is unsustainable.
"If we have one or two children, then we're really just replacing ourselves," he said. "Two parents and two children - of course some people don't have children at all. So if most people said, 'Yes, I'll have one or two children and that's enough, that's me with my family,' then the population will gradually decline and we'll get back to a number that's sustainable."
The Optimum Population Trust wants the world to prioritize family planning. It estimates that 200 million women - mainly in sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Asia - don't have access to birth control. Given the opportunity, the Trust believes many people would choose to have fewer children.
"We are talking about voluntary methods here," he added. "There's no implication from us that this is something that people will be made to do. It's something that people actually do want to do. If they have access to those methods they tend to have one or two children, that's our experience worldwide."
Mainstream5 climate experts continue to see renewable energies like solar power as the solution. Derry Newman, the CEO of Solar Century, Britain's largest solar energy company, doesn't believe population control is the answer.
"Who are we to dictate6 whether you should or should not have the next generation? And there are many, many more things to do before we consider such draconian7 objectives," he said.
The world's population can be supported, he says, but developed countries with large carbon footprints need to change the way they generate and use energy.
"Most people want to do the right thing," he added. "Very few people want to be wasteful8. Very few people want to spend more on energy than they really need to. So if you can give people options which are cost-effective, long term value-adding to their property or business, and help them do what they believe to be the right thing, then it is win-win all around."
How to cut energy consumption, switch to cleaner technologies and find funding for it all - these are issues that delegates, government ministers and world leaders are discussing in Copenhagen this week. And they are being reminded that what they do will determine the lives of the world's future generations.
1 consensus | |
n.(意见等的)一致,一致同意,共识 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 emissions | |
排放物( emission的名词复数 ); 散发物(尤指气体) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 espousing | |
v.(决定)支持,拥护(目标、主张等)( espouse的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 census | |
n.(官方的)人口调查,人口普查 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 mainstream | |
n.(思想或行为的)主流;adj.主流的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 dictate | |
v.口授;(使)听写;指令,指示,命令 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 draconian | |
adj.严苛的;苛刻的;严酷的;龙一样的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 wasteful | |
adj.(造成)浪费的,挥霍的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
本文本内容来源于互联网抓取和网友提交,仅供参考,部分栏目没有内容,如果您有更合适的内容,欢迎 点击提交 分享给大家。