搜索关注在线英语听力室公众号:tingroom,领取免费英语资料大礼包。
(单词翻译)
This is Scientific American's 60-Second Science. I'm Christopher Intagliata. Got a minute?
Engineers are always plugging away to get better energy efficiency out of our products -- like cars that guzzle1 less gas or light bulbs that burn brighter on fewer watts2. But even if we replaced all today's bulbs with energy-sipping LEDs, the world might not see any energy savings3, according to a study in the Journal of Physics D. Because the more efficient lights get, the more light we tend to use.
The researchers looked at light consumption since the year 1700. Even though today's compact fluorescents are 500 times more efficient than candles and whale oil lamps, what we spend on overall lighting4 hasn't gone down. It's just increased proportionately to our wealth. For the past 300 years we've consistently spent just about seven-tenths-of-one-percent of our gross domestic product on artificial lighting. And the researchers think this trend could continue, because many parts of the world still haven't satisfied their appetite for light.
The upside is, more lighting means more productivity. But if the goal is green living, LEDs may not be a stand-alone solution. Instead, the authors suggest coupling those LEDs with energy policies that encourage smart lighting use. Now that's a bright idea.
Thanks for the minute. For Scientific American's 60-Second Science, I'm Christopher Intagliata.
1 guzzle | |
v.狂饮,暴食 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 watts | |
(电力计量单位)瓦,瓦特( watt的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 savings | |
n.存款,储蓄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 lighting | |
n.照明,光线的明暗,舞台灯光 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
本文本内容来源于互联网抓取和网友提交,仅供参考,部分栏目没有内容,如果您有更合适的内容,欢迎 点击提交 分享给大家。