SSS 2011-07-19
时间:2011-08-09 05:42:12
搜索关注在线英语听力室公众号:tingroom,领取免费英语资料大礼包。
(单词翻译)
This is Scientific American’s 60-Second Science. I’m Cynthia Graber. This will just take a minute.
Medieval armor certainly looks heavy. And now researchers have demonstrated how the protection might have unwittingly put its wearers at a heavy disadvantage on the battlefield.
An armored combatant in the 1400s had between about 60 to 110 pounds of steel on his head and body. The scientists wanted to know how that weight
affected1 performance. They recruited battle experts from the Royal Armouries Museum in Leeds, in the U.K., who got into
replicas2 of four types of European armor.
The weighted
warriors3 then walked and ran on a
treadmill4 while the research team measured their oxygen
intake5. Wearing the armor turned out to be a much greater burden than carrying the same weight in a backpack. Because the distribution of weight in the armor requires the wearer to use more energy to swing his arms or move his legs. The scientists published the research in the journal
Proceedings6 of the Royal Society B.
Armor wearers also wound up taking short, shallow breaths rather than the deep breaths associated with regular
exertion7. The researchers say that the tight, metal shell may have made the soldiers feel safer. But being weighted down probably made it a long day for a
knight8.
Thanks for the minute. For Scientific American’s 60-Second Science, I’m Cynthia Graber.
分享到: