搜索关注在线英语听力室公众号:tingroom,领取免费英语资料大礼包。
(单词翻译)
As in many other fields, gender1 bias2 pervades3 the sciences. Men score higher starting salaries, have more mentoring4, and have better odds5 of being hired. Studies show they’re also perceived as more competent than women in STEM fields. And new research reveals that men are more likely to receive excellent letters of recommendation, too.
"Say, you know, this is the best student I've ever had." Kuheli Dutt [koo-HAY-lee], a social scientist and diversity officer at Columbia University's Lamont campus. Compare those excellent letters, she says, to a merely good letter: "The candidate was productive, or intelligent, or a solid scientist or something that's clearly solid praise," but nothing that singles out the candidate as exceptional or one of a kind.
Dutt and her colleagues studied more than 1,200 letters of recommendation for postdoc positions in geoscience. They were all redacted for gender and other identifying information, so Dutt and her team could assign them a score without knowing the sex of the student. They found that female applicants6 were only half as likely to snag superlative letters, compared to their male counterparts. That includes letters of rec from all over the world, and written by, yes, men and women. The findings are in the journal Nature Geoscience. [Kuheli Dutt et al., Gender differences in recommendation letters for postdoctoral fellowships in geoscience]
Dutt says they were not able to evaluate the actual scientific qualifications of the applicants using the archival data. But she says the results still suggest women in geoscience are at a potential disadvantage from the very beginning of their careers—starting with those less-than-outstanding letters of rec.
"We're not trying to assign blame or criticize anyone or call anyone consciously sexist. Rather, the point is to use the results of this study to open up meaningful dialogues on implicit7 gender bias, be it at a departmental level or an institutional level or even a discipline level." Which may lead to some recommendations for the letter writers themselves.
—Christopher Intagliata
1 gender | |
n.(生理上的)性,(名词、代词等的)性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 bias | |
n.偏见,偏心,偏袒;vt.使有偏见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 pervades | |
v.遍及,弥漫( pervade的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 mentoring | |
n.mentoring是一种工作关系。mentor通常是处在比mentee更高工作职位上的有影响力的人。他/她有比‘mentee’更丰富的工作经验和知识,并用心支持mentee的职业(发展)。v.(无经验之人的)有经验可信赖的顾问( mentor的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 odds | |
n.让步,机率,可能性,比率;胜败优劣之别 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 applicants | |
申请人,求职人( applicant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 implicit | |
a.暗示的,含蓄的,不明晰的,绝对的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
本文本内容来源于互联网抓取和网友提交,仅供参考,部分栏目没有内容,如果您有更合适的内容,欢迎 点击提交 分享给大家。