科学美国人60秒 SSS Gulf Dead Zone Makes for Shrimpier Shrimp

（单词翻译）

Every spring, the Mississippi River dumps tens of thousands of tons of nutrient¹ runoff into the Gulf² of Mexico. Add temperature, current and wind to that pollution, and you have the Western Hemisphere's largest stretch of oxygen-poor waters—a so-called "dead zone."

That dead zone hits the Gulf's famed—and financially important—brown shrimp³ fisheries. And it does two things: first, the low oxygen slows down the shrimps’ growth. 

"The other thing that occurs is what I like to call the burning building effect." Martin Smith, an environmental economist⁴ at Duke University. "The shrimp try to avoid the low oxygen so they swim out of these areas of depleted⁵ oxygen. As a result they end up kind of aggregating⁶ on the edges. They kind of line up outside the deoxygenated waters. And that's why I call it the burning building effect. If you're in a burning building you're running to get out of the fire, you don't keep running when you get outside, you stop and you take a breath." 

Fishermen flock to where those shrimp "take a breath." And shrimp get caught earlier in the season. So combine these two effects—slower growth and earlier catches—and the result is a haul of more small shrimp, and fewer large and jumbo shrimp. Meaning the price on big shrimp temporarily goes up. Supply and demand, right? 

Smith and his team studied that link—between the dead zone and a spike⁷ in large shrimp prices—using 20 years of shrimp pricing data. Their analysis is in the Proceedings⁸ of the National Academy of Sciences. [Martin D. Smith, Seafood⁹ prices reveal impacts of a major ecological¹⁰ disturbance]

The brown shrimp fishery in the Gulf was once the most valuable in the U.S. Now, Smith says, we can measure the true cost of that nutrient runoff. "We can start to ask questions like, how much does the shrimp industry lose as a result of this problem, and how does that compare to what it would cost to control nutrient flows coming from food prediction upstream in the Mississippi watershed¹¹?" In other words—whether there might be some net economic benefit to keeping the water environmentally protected.

—Christopher Intagliata