搜索关注在线英语听力室公众号:tingroom,领取免费英语资料大礼包。
(单词翻译)
State legislative1 races are on the front lines of democracy this midterm cycle
State legislative races can feel low stakes when compared to national political contests. But 2022 is shaping up a little differently.
Democratically aligned3 super PACs and party-affiliated groups are spending tens of millions of dollars around the country to try to change the composition of state legislatures in key swing states, warning that fair elections could hang in the balance.
The Republican Party aims to defend its majorities and to flip4 chambers5 in states where Democrats6 currently control both the legislature and governorship.
In either scenario7, these legislative bodies have become increasingly powerful in setting policy around health care, voting, education and reproductive rights.
The U.S. Supreme8 Court could give state legislatures power over federal elections
Much of Democrats' urgency stems from a case that the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear this fall. The outcome of Moore v. Harper, a fight over partisan9 gerrymandering in North Carolina, could give a fringe legal doctrine10 known as the 'independent state legislature theory' new legitimacy11.
Proponents12 of the theory argue that the U.S. Constitution gives state legislatures near total control over running federal elections, overriding13 both state constitutions and state courts. In an extreme scenario, the theory could be used as justification14 for a legislature "to refuse to certify15 the results of a presidential election and instead select its own slate16 of electors," counsel for the Brennan Center for Justice, a non-profit think tank and advocacy group, wrote in June.
That's a real concern for Democrats. After the 2020 election, many Republican lawmakers in states like Pennsylvania, Arizona and Wisconsin took steps to overturn the election or cast doubt on the results.
Four of the six conservative Supreme Court justices have indicated support for the theory in recent opinions.
Currently, the GOP holds majorities in the state legislatures of most major swing states. As a result, Democrats and Democratically-aligned outside spending groups are pouring money into competitive state legislature races where they see an opportunity to flip seats.
"A single Arizona state Senate seat could be more important than any other election in the country this year when it comes to the health and stability of our democracy," says Daniel Squadron, former state senator from New York and founder17 of the super PAC The States Project.
Spending on legislative races has skyrocketed
The States Project has committed to spending $60 million on these races. Forward Majority, another group promoting Democratic candidates in state legislatures, is investing $20 million this cycle, 70% of which will go to 25 state legislative races in three states: Pennsylvania, Arizona and Michigan.
Much of that spending is just to get voters on the ground in key areas to care about these races.
"Voters often don't know who the candidates are, they don't know what's at stake, and they don't always vote the whole ballot," says Vicky Hausman, founder and co-CEO of Forward Majority.
Those 25 elected officials could be a "bulwark18" against attempts, like those following the 2020 elections, to send independent electors to Washington and override19 the popular vote, says Hausman.
The official party arm, the DLCC, announced it had raised $45 million for these races as of October.
Still, these numbers pale in comparison to how much can be spent on a single congressional contest.
The Republican Party wants to protect its majorities. Gerrymandering helps.
The GOP's aim this cycle is largely to hold its ground.
"We've said from the start that our number one priority this year is defending our razor-thin majorities in states like Arizona, Michigan, and New Hampshire," RSLC Communications Director Andrew Romeo wrote to NPR. "That hasn't changed as we come down the stretch."
The overturning of Roe20 v. Wade21 has boosted Democrats, making the possibility of a total "red wave" less certain. Conventional political wisdom dictates22 that they should win more seats, as the party not in the White House usually does during the midterms.
However, in many states Republicans have another kind of edge. In order to redraw district lines to benefit their own party after the 2010 census23, Republicans put in a majority to win state legislatures that year. Even after another round of redistricting since then, very few races are actually in play. The party already holds the majority in 55 of the 88 chambers with elections this year, according to the RSLC.
"It's this endless feedback loop where the state legislature plays a hand in drawing its own lines, runs for office in those lines, and then can stay in office," says Sam Wang, professor and director of the Gerrymandering Project at Princeton University.
State legislatures are in the driver's seat on key issues from abortion24 to voting
State legislatures have grown in influence and power over the last two decades, leading to a patchwork25 of laws around the country on reproductive rights, voter registration26, health care, education and guns.
"The decisions made in state capitals probably have a greater impact on people's routine activities than many of the decisions made in Washington, D.C.," says Peverill Squire27, professor of political science at the University of Missouri.
Some of that is unintentional, as gridlock in Congress slowed down the pace of federal legislation, he says. Some of it is explicit28, as when in 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down parts of the Voting Rights Act and allowed states to make changes to election law without prior federal approval.
When it comes to abortion rights, a change of power in some state chambers could either give the GOP the edge to override vetoes by Democratic governors to institute new restrictions29 – for example in North Carolina – or could put more Democrats in a position to preserve abortion rights, in states such as Pennsylvania and Michigan.
"States and state legislatures in particular are setting the tone and direction for our country ... while the rest of us are distracted by the shiny objects inside the Beltway," says Squadron.
1 legislative | |
n.立法机构,立法权;adj.立法的,有立法权的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 aligned | |
adj.对齐的,均衡的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 flip | |
vt.快速翻动;轻抛;轻拍;n.轻抛;adj.轻浮的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 chambers | |
n.房间( chamber的名词复数 );(议会的)议院;卧室;会议厅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 scenario | |
n.剧本,脚本;概要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 legitimacy | |
n.合法,正当 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 proponents | |
n.(某事业、理论等的)支持者,拥护者( proponent的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 overriding | |
a.最主要的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 justification | |
n.正当的理由;辩解的理由 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 certify | |
vt.证明,证实;发证书(或执照)给 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 slate | |
n.板岩,石板,石片,石板色,候选人名单;adj.暗蓝灰色的,含板岩的;vt.用石板覆盖,痛打,提名,预订 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 Founder | |
n.创始者,缔造者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 bulwark | |
n.堡垒,保障,防御 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 override | |
vt.不顾,不理睬,否决;压倒,优先于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 roe | |
n.鱼卵;獐鹿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 wade | |
v.跋涉,涉水;n.跋涉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 dictates | |
n.命令,规定,要求( dictate的名词复数 )v.大声讲或读( dictate的第三人称单数 );口授;支配;摆布 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 census | |
n.(官方的)人口调查,人口普查 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 abortion | |
n.流产,堕胎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 patchwork | |
n.混杂物;拼缝物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 registration | |
n.登记,注册,挂号 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 squire | |
n.护卫, 侍从, 乡绅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 explicit | |
adj.详述的,明确的;坦率的;显然的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 restrictions | |
约束( restriction的名词复数 ); 管制; 制约因素; 带限制性的条件(或规则) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
本文本内容来源于互联网抓取和网友提交,仅供参考,部分栏目没有内容,如果您有更合适的内容,欢迎 点击提交 分享给大家。